Spring AI vs LangChain4j 2026: Java Developer's Complete Guide to LLM Integration

TL;DR — 30-Second Verdict
Spring AI is the right choice if you are already deep in the Spring ecosystem and want the least friction integrating ChatGPT, Claude, or Ollama into a Spring Boot service — auto-configuration, familiar @Bean patterns, and the ChatClient fluent API make it feel native. LangChain4j wins when you need maximum flexibility: more LLM providers, richer RAG pipeline control, AiServices interface magic, and framework-agnostic portability. For most enterprise Java teams starting fresh in 2026, Spring AI is the default; reach for LangChain4j when you need features Spring AI has not yet shipped.

Quick Comparison Table

Feature Spring AI LangChain4j
Backing Spring team (Broadcom) — official Spring project Open-source community (LangChain4j org)
Spring Integration Excellent — first-class auto-config, Spring starters Good — Spring Boot starters available, less seamless
LLM Providers OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, Ollama, Mistral, Google VertexAI, Bedrock, Groq 20+ including all of the above + Cohere, HuggingFace, Jlama, Qianfan, Zhipu, WatsonX
RAG Support QuestionAnswerAdvisor, VectorStore, ETL pipeline RetrievalAugmentor, ContentRetriever, re-ranking, hybrid search
Vector Stores PgVector, Redis, Chroma, Pinecone, Qdrant, Weaviate, OpenSearch, Milvus Same + Cassandra, Vearch, Azure AI Search, more community stores
Function Calling Yes — @Bean function registration, auto-discovery Yes — @Tool annotation on any method, very ergonomic
Streaming Yes — Flux<ChatResponse> / SSE Yes — StreamingResponseHandler / Flux
Maturity (2026) 1.0 GA — production ready 0.36+ — stable, widely used in production
Learning Curve Low for Spring devs Medium — new concepts (AiServices, pipeline)
License Apache 2.0 Apache 2.0

Introduction: Java's AI Moment Has Arrived

For years, Python dominated AI and ML development. Libraries like LangChain (Python), LlamaIndex, and Hugging Face Transformers made Python the de facto language for building LLM-powered applications. Java developers watched from the sidelines, stitching together raw HTTP calls to OpenAI or wrapping Python scripts in ProcessBuilder. That era is over.

In 2026, Java has two mature, production-grade frameworks for LLM integration: Spring AI and LangChain4j. Both can do the heavy lifting — chatbots, RAG pipelines, agent loops, embeddings, tool/function calling, and streaming responses. Both support the major LLM providers. The choice between them is now a genuine architectural decision, not a question of capability.

The numbers back this up. LangChain4j crossed 5,000 GitHub stars and 100 contributors in 2025. Spring AI shipped its 1.0 GA release, triggering adoption across thousands of Spring Boot applications already in production. Stack Overflow's 2026 developer survey showed "Java AI" as one of the fastest-growing tag combinations, up 340% year-over-year.

This guide is written for Java developers who already understand Spring Boot, dependency injection, and REST APIs — and want a clear, technical, code-first answer to the question: should I use Spring AI or LangChain4j for my next project? We will look at both frameworks in depth, compare the same tasks side by side, and give you a decision framework for real-world scenarios.

Version Reference: All code in this article targets Spring AI 1.0.0 (Spring Boot 3.3+, Java 21+) and LangChain4j 0.36.0. APIs can change between releases — always check the official docs for your version.

Spring AI Deep Dive

What Is Spring AI?

Spring AI is an official Spring project from the Broadcom/Spring team. It follows the same design philosophy as the rest of the Spring ecosystem: convention over configuration, dependency injection, and auto-configuration that just works. If you have ever set up a Spring Data JPA repository or a Spring Security configuration, Spring AI will feel immediately familiar.

At its core, Spring AI provides a portable abstraction layer over LLM providers. You write your application code against the Spring AI interfaces (ChatClient, ChatModel, EmbeddingModel, VectorStore), and switching from OpenAI to Anthropic Claude to a local Ollama instance is a matter of changing Maven dependencies and a few application.properties entries — zero code changes in most cases.

Auto-Configuration Magic

Add the Spring AI OpenAI starter to your pom.xml, set spring.ai.openai.api-key in your properties file, and Spring Boot auto-configures a fully functional ChatClient bean. No factories, no boilerplate HTTP clients, no JSON parsing. This is the same zero-friction experience Spring Boot devs have with databases, messaging, and caching — now extended to AI.

ChatClient API

The ChatClient is Spring AI's primary user-facing API since 1.0. It offers a fluent builder pattern for constructing prompts, attaching system messages, enabling advisors (middleware for RAG, logging, safety), and controlling output format:

// Spring AI ChatClient fluent API
String response = chatClient.prompt()
    .system("You are a senior Java architect.")
    .user("Explain reactive streams in 3 sentences.")
    .call()
    .content();

Advisors — Spring AI's Middleware Layer

Advisors are Spring AI's elegant solution to cross-cutting concerns. They wrap the ChatClient call pipeline, intercepting requests and responses. The built-in QuestionAnswerAdvisor injects retrieved vector store context into every prompt automatically — this is how Spring AI implements RAG without you writing a retrieval loop.

Supported Models

Spring AI 1.0 ships first-class support for: OpenAI (GPT-4o, o3, o4-mini), Anthropic (Claude 3.5/3.7 Sonnet, Claude Opus 4), Google (Gemini 2.0 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Pro), Ollama (any local model), Mistral AI, Amazon Bedrock (Claude, Llama, Titan), Azure OpenAI, and Groq. Each has its own Spring Boot starter artifact.

Code Example: Spring Boot REST Endpoint with Claude via Spring AI

Full working example — a REST endpoint that calls Anthropic Claude with a system prompt, streams a response, and returns it as plain text:

// pom.xml dependency
<dependency>
  <groupId>org.springframework.ai</groupId>
  <artifactId>spring-ai-anthropic-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
  <version>1.0.0</version>
</dependency>

// application.properties
spring.ai.anthropic.api-key=${ANTHROPIC_API_KEY}
spring.ai.anthropic.chat.options.model=claude-sonnet-4-5
spring.ai.anthropic.chat.options.max-tokens=1024
import org.springframework.ai.chat.client.ChatClient;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.*;
import reactor.core.publisher.Flux;

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/ai")
public class AiController {

    private final ChatClient chatClient;

    public AiController(ChatClient.Builder builder) {
        this.chatClient = builder
            .defaultSystem("You are a helpful Java expert. " +
                           "Answer concisely with code examples.")
            .build();
    }

    // Blocking call — simple use case
    @GetMapping("/ask")
    public String ask(@RequestParam String question) {
        return chatClient.prompt()
            .user(question)
            .call()
            .content();
    }

    // Streaming call — returns Server-Sent Events
    @GetMapping(value = "/stream", produces = "text/event-stream")
    public Flux<String> stream(@RequestParam String question) {
        return chatClient.prompt()
            .user(question)
            .stream()
            .content();
    }

    // Structured output — map response to a Java record
    record CodeReview(String verdict, String explanation, int score) {}

    @PostMapping("/review")
    public CodeReview review(@RequestBody String code) {
        return chatClient.prompt()
            .user("Review this Java code and rate it 1-10:\n\n" + code)
            .call()
            .entity(CodeReview.class);  // Spring AI deserializes automatically
    }
}

The ChatClient.Builder is auto-configured by Spring Boot. You inject it, set defaults, and your endpoint is live. No API client boilerplate, no serialization code for the structured output case — Spring AI injects the JSON schema into the prompt and deserializes the response automatically.

LangChain4j Deep Dive

What Is LangChain4j?

LangChain4j is a Java port of the Python LangChain library, but it has evolved into its own distinct framework with Java-first idioms. Rather than slavishly copying Python patterns, LangChain4j embraces Java strengths: interfaces, annotations, generics, and compile-time safety. The result is a framework that feels natural to Java developers while providing the full suite of LLM building blocks.

The key design difference from Spring AI: LangChain4j is framework-agnostic by default. You can use it in a plain Java main method, a Quarkus service, a Micronaut app, or — with the Spring Boot starter — a Spring Boot application. This flexibility comes at the cost of slightly more explicit configuration compared to Spring AI's auto-wire-everything approach.

AiServices — Interface Magic

LangChain4j's most celebrated feature is AiServices. You define a Java interface with annotated methods, and LangChain4j generates a proxy at runtime that handles the entire LLM interaction — prompt templating, memory injection, tool invocation, and response parsing — all transparently.

import dev.langchain4j.service.*;

// Define what you want — LangChain4j builds the implementation
interface JavaMentor {

    @SystemMessage("You are a senior Java architect with 20 years experience.")
    String advise(@UserMessage String question);

    @SystemMessage("You are a code reviewer. Be strict and concise.")
    @UserMessage("Review this code and give a score 1-10: {{code}}")
    CodeReview review(@V("code") String javaCode);

    // Streaming variant
    TokenStream streamAdvice(@UserMessage String question);
}

// Create the service
JavaMentor mentor = AiServices.builder(JavaMentor.class)
    .chatLanguageModel(model)
    .chatMemory(MessageWindowChatMemory.withMaxMessages(10))
    .build();

// Use it like a regular Java object
String advice = mentor.advise("When should I use virtual threads?");

Memory

LangChain4j ships MessageWindowChatMemory (keep last N messages) and TokenWindowChatMemory (keep within token budget). Both are injected into AiServices automatically — the framework manages the conversation state and injects prior messages into each new request behind the scenes.

Tools / Function Calling

In LangChain4j, any class method annotated with @Tool becomes available to the LLM as a callable function. The framework handles schema generation, invocation, and result injection automatically:

import dev.langchain4j.agent.tool.Tool;
import dev.langchain4j.agent.tool.P;

public class DatabaseTools {

    @Tool("Look up a customer's order history by their ID")
    public List<Order> getOrderHistory(@P("The customer ID") String customerId) {
        return orderRepository.findByCustomerId(customerId);
    }

    @Tool("Get the current price of a product")
    public double getProductPrice(@P("Product SKU") String sku) {
        return catalogService.getPrice(sku);
    }
}

// Wire tools into AiServices
CustomerAgent agent = AiServices.builder(CustomerAgent.class)
    .chatLanguageModel(model)
    .tools(new DatabaseTools(orderRepository, catalogService))
    .chatMemory(MessageWindowChatMemory.withMaxMessages(20))
    .build();

Document Loaders and RAG Chains

LangChain4j provides a rich document processing ecosystem. You can load PDFs, Word docs, HTML pages, GitHub repos, S3 objects, and plain text. Documents are split by DocumentSplitter implementations (recursive character, sentence, token-aware), embedded via any EmbeddingModel, and stored in a EmbeddingStore.

Full RAG Chain with LangChain4j

import dev.langchain4j.data.document.*;
import dev.langchain4j.data.document.loader.FileSystemDocumentLoader;
import dev.langchain4j.data.document.splitter.DocumentSplitters;
import dev.langchain4j.data.segment.TextSegment;
import dev.langchain4j.model.embedding.AllMiniLmL6V2EmbeddingModel;
import dev.langchain4j.store.embedding.EmbeddingStore;
import dev.langchain4j.store.embedding.EmbeddingStoreIngestor;
import dev.langchain4j.store.embedding.pgvector.PgVectorEmbeddingStore;
import dev.langchain4j.rag.content.retriever.EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever;
import dev.langchain4j.service.AiServices;

// 1. Load documents
List<Document> docs = FileSystemDocumentLoader.loadDocuments("/docs/api-specs");

// 2. Configure the embedding store (PostgreSQL + pgvector)
EmbeddingStore<TextSegment> store = PgVectorEmbeddingStore.builder()
    .host("localhost")
    .port(5432)
    .database("techoral_ai")
    .user("postgres")
    .password(System.getenv("DB_PASSWORD"))
    .table("api_docs_embeddings")
    .dimension(384)  // all-MiniLM-L6-v2 output dimension
    .build();

// 3. Ingest: split → embed → store
EmbeddingStoreIngestor ingestor = EmbeddingStoreIngestor.builder()
    .documentSplitter(DocumentSplitters.recursive(512, 64))
    .embeddingModel(new AllMiniLmL6V2EmbeddingModel())
    .embeddingStore(store)
    .build();
ingestor.ingest(docs);

// 4. Build RAG-enabled AiService
interface ApiAdvisor {
    @SystemMessage("You are a helpful API documentation assistant. " +
                   "Answer based on the provided context only.")
    String answer(@UserMessage String question);
}

ApiAdvisor advisor = AiServices.builder(ApiAdvisor.class)
    .chatLanguageModel(openAiModel)
    .contentRetriever(EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.builder()
        .embeddingStore(store)
        .embeddingModel(new AllMiniLmL6V2EmbeddingModel())
        .maxResults(5)
        .minScore(0.75)
        .build())
    .build();

// 5. Query
String answer = advisor.answer("How do I authenticate with the payments API?");

Side-by-Side Code Comparison: Same Task, Both Frameworks

Task: Call an LLM with a system prompt + user message and return the response as a structured Java object.

Spring AI Version

// Spring AI — structured output via ChatClient
record ProductDescription(
    String name,
    String elevator_pitch,
    List<String> key_features,
    String target_audience
) {}

@Service
public class ProductService {

    private final ChatClient chatClient;

    public ProductService(ChatClient.Builder builder) {
        this.chatClient = builder
            .defaultSystem("You are a product marketing expert. " +
                           "Always respond with valid JSON matching the schema provided.")
            .build();
    }

    public ProductDescription generateDescription(String rawNotes) {
        return chatClient.prompt()
            .user("Generate a product description from these notes:\n\n" + rawNotes)
            .call()
            .entity(ProductDescription.class);
        // Spring AI automatically injects JSON schema into prompt
        // and deserializes the LLM response into ProductDescription
    }
}

LangChain4j Version

// LangChain4j — structured output via AiServices
record ProductDescription(
    String name,
    @Description("One sentence that sells the product")
    String elevator_pitch,
    List<String> key_features,
    String target_audience
) {}

interface ProductMarketer {
    @SystemMessage("You are a product marketing expert.")
    @UserMessage("""
        Generate a product description from these notes:
        {{notes}}
        """)
    ProductDescription generateDescription(@V("notes") String rawNotes);
}

@Service
public class ProductService {

    private final ProductMarketer marketer;

    public ProductService(ChatLanguageModel model) {
        this.marketer = AiServices.create(ProductMarketer.class, model);
        // LangChain4j also injects JSON schema automatically
        // and deserializes the response
    }

    public ProductDescription generateDescription(String rawNotes) {
        return marketer.generateDescription(rawNotes);
    }
}
Verdict on structured output: Both frameworks generate the JSON schema from the Java record/class definition and handle deserialization. Spring AI's approach is slightly more imperative (.entity(Class)), while LangChain4j's return type on the interface method carries the intent — arguably cleaner for teams that want to keep AI concerns in the interface layer.

RAG Implementation Comparison

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is the most common production AI pattern: ground the LLM's responses in your own documents by retrieving relevant context at query time. Both frameworks support RAG but with different abstractions.

Spring AI RAG — Advisor Pattern

Spring AI uses the QuestionAnswerAdvisor which plugs into the ChatClient pipeline. The ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) pipeline handles document ingestion:

// Spring AI — Document Ingestion (ETL Pipeline)
@Component
public class DocumentIngestionService {

    private final VectorStore vectorStore;
    private final TokenTextSplitter splitter;

    public DocumentIngestionService(VectorStore vectorStore) {
        this.vectorStore = vectorStore;
        this.splitter = new TokenTextSplitter(512, 64, 5, 10000, true);
    }

    public void ingest(Resource pdfResource) {
        // Read → Split → Embed → Store (one pipeline)
        new TokenTextSplitter()
            .apply(new PagePdfDocumentReader(pdfResource).get())
            .forEach(vectorStore::add);
    }
}

// Spring AI — RAG Query with QuestionAnswerAdvisor
@Service
public class KnowledgeBaseService {

    private final ChatClient chatClient;

    public KnowledgeBaseService(ChatClient.Builder builder, VectorStore vectorStore) {
        this.chatClient = builder
            .defaultSystem("Answer based on the provided context. " +
                           "If the context does not contain the answer, say so.")
            .defaultAdvisors(new QuestionAnswerAdvisor(
                vectorStore,
                SearchRequest.query("").withTopK(5).withSimilarityThreshold(0.75)
            ))
            .build();
    }

    public String query(String question) {
        return chatClient.prompt()
            .user(question)
            .call()
            .content();
        // QuestionAnswerAdvisor intercepts the call,
        // runs a vector similarity search,
        // injects the top-K chunks into the prompt,
        // then forwards to the LLM
    }
}

LangChain4j RAG — RetrievalAugmentor

LangChain4j exposes more RAG internals, allowing you to customize each step of the pipeline — query transformation, retrieval, re-ranking, and content injection:

// LangChain4j — Advanced RAG with RetrievalAugmentor
import dev.langchain4j.rag.DefaultRetrievalAugmentor;
import dev.langchain4j.rag.RetrievalAugmentor;
import dev.langchain4j.rag.content.retriever.*;
import dev.langchain4j.rag.query.transformer.*;

// Query compression transformer — rewrites the question using chat history
QueryTransformer transformer = CompressingQueryTransformer.builder()
    .chatLanguageModel(compressionModel)
    .build();

// Primary retriever — dense vector search
ContentRetriever denseRetriever = EmbeddingStoreContentRetriever.builder()
    .embeddingStore(pgVectorStore)
    .embeddingModel(embeddingModel)
    .maxResults(10)
    .minScore(0.70)
    .build();

// Secondary retriever — keyword/BM25 search (hybrid RAG)
ContentRetriever sparseRetriever = WebSearchContentRetriever.builder()
    .webSearchEngine(googleSearchEngine)
    .maxResults(3)
    .build();

// Combine retrievers for hybrid search
RetrievalAugmentor augmentor = DefaultRetrievalAugmentor.builder()
    .queryTransformer(transformer)
    .contentRetriever(denseRetriever)  // in practice, wrap both in ContentAggregator
    .build();

interface TechAdvisor {
    @SystemMessage("You are a senior software architect.")
    String advise(@UserMessage String question);
}

TechAdvisor advisor = AiServices.builder(TechAdvisor.class)
    .chatLanguageModel(model)
    .retrievalAugmentor(augmentor)
    .chatMemory(MessageWindowChatMemory.withMaxMessages(10))
    .build();
RAG Verdict: Spring AI's advisor pattern is simpler and sufficient for 80% of RAG use cases. LangChain4j's RetrievalAugmentor gives you explicit control over query transformation, multi-retriever fusion, re-ranking, and content filtering — critical for advanced RAG patterns like HyDE (Hypothetical Document Embeddings) or RAPTOR (Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrieval).

Supported LLM Providers

Provider Spring AI LangChain4j Notes
OpenAI (GPT-4o, o3, o4-mini) Yes Yes Both support function calling, vision, streaming
Anthropic Claude (Sonnet, Opus) Yes Yes Extended thinking supported in both
Ollama (local models) Yes Yes Run Llama 3, Mistral, Phi-3 locally
Mistral AI Yes Yes Mistral Large, Mixtral
Google Gemini Yes (VertexAI) Yes Gemini 2.0 Flash, 2.5 Pro
Azure OpenAI Yes Yes Enterprise with private deployment
Amazon Bedrock Yes Yes Claude on Bedrock, Titan, Llama on Bedrock
Cohere No Yes Command R+, rerank models
Hugging Face No Yes Inference API, 200k+ models
Groq Yes Yes Ultra-fast inference
IBM WatsonX No Yes Enterprise IBM environments
Jlama (JVM-native models) No Yes Run small models in-process on JVM
Provider verdict: If your organization uses Cohere for reranking, Hugging Face for open-source models, or IBM WatsonX for enterprise compliance, LangChain4j is the only option. For teams on OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google, both frameworks are equivalent.

Spring Boot Integration Depth

This is where Spring AI has a structural advantage. It is built by the Spring team, for the Spring ecosystem, and it shows at every level.

Spring AI Auto-Configuration

Add one starter, set one property — everything is wired:

<!-- Spring AI: ONE dependency, fully configured -->
<dependency>
  <groupId>org.springframework.ai</groupId>
  <artifactId>spring-ai-openai-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
  <version>1.0.0</version>
</dependency>

# application.properties
spring.ai.openai.api-key=${OPENAI_API_KEY}
spring.ai.openai.chat.options.model=gpt-4o
spring.ai.openai.chat.options.temperature=0.7
spring.ai.openai.chat.options.max-tokens=2048

# That's it. ChatClient, ChatModel, EmbeddingModel beans are ready.

LangChain4j Spring Boot Starter

LangChain4j also provides Spring Boot starters, but configuration is slightly more explicit:

<!-- LangChain4j: two dependencies needed for Spring Boot -->
<dependency>
  <groupId>dev.langchain4j</groupId>
  <artifactId>langchain4j-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
  <version>0.36.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
  <groupId>dev.langchain4j</groupId>
  <artifactId>langchain4j-open-ai-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
  <version>0.36.0</version>
</dependency>

# application.properties
langchain4j.open-ai.chat-model.api-key=${OPENAI_API_KEY}
langchain4j.open-ai.chat-model.model-name=gpt-4o
langchain4j.open-ai.chat-model.temperature=0.7
langchain4j.open-ai.chat-model.max-tokens=2048

# AiServices beans are auto-scanned if you use @AiService annotation (0.36+)

Actuator, Observability, and Tracing

Spring AI integrates natively with Spring Boot Actuator, Micrometer, and OpenTelemetry. You get metrics (spring.ai.chat.observations), traces that propagate through your AI calls, and health endpoints — all with zero extra configuration if you already use the Spring observability stack. LangChain4j requires manual instrumentation or the community observability module to achieve the same.

Spring AI also benefits from:
  • Spring Security integration — protect AI endpoints with method security
  • Spring Data integration — VectorStore implementations for all major Spring Data modules
  • Spring Batch integration — process large document corpora through batch ingestion pipelines
  • Spring Integration — wire AI calls into message-driven architectures
  • Spring Boot Test support — @SpringBootTest works perfectly, including mocked ChatClient

When to Choose Each Framework

Choose Spring AI When...

  • Your team already uses Spring Boot and values Spring conventions
  • You want auto-configuration with zero boilerplate
  • You need tight Actuator/Micrometer/OTel integration
  • You are integrating AI into an existing Spring microservices architecture
  • You primarily use OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google models
  • You want long-term stability and LTS from a major vendor
  • Your RAG requirements are standard (no re-ranking, no hybrid search)
  • You use Spring Security and need AI endpoints under the same auth model

Choose LangChain4j When...

  • You need LLM providers Spring AI does not support (Cohere, HuggingFace, WatsonX, Jlama)
  • You want the AiServices interface pattern for clean AI service contracts
  • You need advanced RAG: query transformation, re-ranking, hybrid search
  • You are building a complex agent with multiple tools and memory strategies
  • You are not on Spring Boot (Quarkus, Micronaut, or plain Java)
  • You want maximum flexibility over the full LLM call pipeline
  • You need Jlama for running small models in-process on the JVM
  • Your team prefers annotation-driven interfaces over fluent builders
The Hybrid Option
Some teams use LangChain4j for the AI service layer (AiServices interfaces, tool definitions, RAG pipeline) while relying on Spring Boot's infrastructure for HTTP, security, observability, and data access. The LangChain4j Spring Boot starter makes this clean. You get the best of both: LangChain4j's AI expressiveness with Spring's production-grade infrastructure. This approach works well for teams migrating from Spring AI to LangChain4j for advanced features without rebuilding their entire stack.

Getting Started: Minimal Setup for Both

Spring AI — Minimum Viable Project

<!-- pom.xml — Spring AI with OpenAI -->
<parent>
  <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
  <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
  <version>3.3.5</version>
</parent>

<dependencyManagement>
  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.springframework.ai</groupId>
      <artifactId>spring-ai-bom</artifactId>
      <version>1.0.0</version>
      <type>pom</type>
      <scope>import</scope>
    </dependency>
  </dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>

<dependencies>
  <dependency>
    <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
    <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
  </dependency>
  <dependency>
    <groupId>org.springframework.ai</groupId>
    <artifactId>spring-ai-openai-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
  </dependency>
</dependencies>
// src/main/java/.../Application.java
@SpringBootApplication
public class Application {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
    }
}

// src/main/java/.../ChatController.java
@RestController
public class ChatController {

    private final ChatClient chatClient;

    public ChatController(ChatClient.Builder builder) {
        this.chatClient = builder.build();
    }

    @GetMapping("/chat")
    public String chat(@RequestParam String message) {
        return chatClient.prompt()
            .user(message)
            .call()
            .content();
    }
}
# src/main/resources/application.properties
spring.ai.openai.api-key=${OPENAI_API_KEY}
spring.ai.openai.chat.options.model=gpt-4o-mini

LangChain4j — Minimum Viable Project

<!-- pom.xml — LangChain4j with OpenAI -->
<dependencies>
  <dependency>
    <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
    <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
  </dependency>
  <dependency>
    <groupId>dev.langchain4j</groupId>
    <artifactId>langchain4j-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
    <version>0.36.0</version>
  </dependency>
  <dependency>
    <groupId>dev.langchain4j</groupId>
    <artifactId>langchain4j-open-ai-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
    <version>0.36.0</version>
  </dependency>
</dependencies>
// Define your AI service interface
@AiService  // LangChain4j 0.36+ — auto-creates a Spring bean
interface Assistant {
    @SystemMessage("You are a helpful assistant.")
    String chat(@UserMessage String message);
}

// Inject and use it like any Spring bean
@RestController
public class ChatController {

    private final Assistant assistant;

    public ChatController(Assistant assistant) {
        this.assistant = assistant;
    }

    @GetMapping("/chat")
    public String chat(@RequestParam String message) {
        return assistant.chat(message);
    }
}
# src/main/resources/application.properties
langchain4j.open-ai.chat-model.api-key=${OPENAI_API_KEY}
langchain4j.open-ai.chat-model.model-name=gpt-4o-mini
Both minimal setups result in the same running application: a /chat?message=... endpoint backed by GPT-4o-mini. The difference is architectural: Spring AI's ChatClient vs LangChain4j's @AiService-annotated interface.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is Spring AI production-ready in 2026?

Yes. Spring AI reached its 1.0 GA milestone in mid-2025 and is now production-ready. It ships with stable APIs for chat, embedding, image generation, RAG advisors, and function calling, backed by the full Spring team at Broadcom. The 1.x line follows Spring's standard release cadence with LTS guarantees.

2. Can I use LangChain4j with Spring Boot?

Yes. LangChain4j ships official Spring Boot starter modules (langchain4j-spring-boot-starter and model-specific starters like langchain4j-open-ai-spring-boot-starter). Since version 0.36, the @AiService annotation automatically registers your interface as a Spring bean, making it indistinguishable from hand-written Spring services at the injection site.

3. Which framework supports more LLM providers?

LangChain4j supports a wider range of LLM providers out of the box — over 20 integrations including OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, Mistral, Cohere, Hugging Face, Azure OpenAI, Google Gemini, and more. Spring AI covers the major providers well but has fewer total integrations. If your deployment requires Cohere, HuggingFace Inference API, IBM WatsonX, or Jlama (in-JVM inference), LangChain4j is currently the only option.

4. Which is better for RAG applications?

Both are capable for RAG. Spring AI uses an Advisor pattern that integrates cleanly into the ChatClient fluent API — simple, idiomatic, sufficient for most use cases. LangChain4j offers a more explicit pipeline with RetrievalAugmentor, content injectors, query transformers (compression, HyDE), and content retrievers that give you fine-grained control. For complex RAG with re-ranking, hybrid dense+sparse search, or RAPTOR-style recursive summarization, LangChain4j currently provides more hooks.

5. Can I use both Spring AI and LangChain4j in the same project?

Technically yes, but it is not recommended. Both frameworks configure beans with similar names (chatModel, embeddingModel, vectorStore) and their auto-configurations can conflict. You would need to carefully qualify beans and disable conflicting auto-configs. Pick one as the primary AI framework per service. In a microservices architecture, different services can use different frameworks without conflict.

Conclusion

The Java AI landscape in 2026 is genuinely mature. Both Spring AI and LangChain4j can power production LLM applications — chatbots, RAG pipelines, AI agents, document processing, and more. The choice comes down to context.

Spring AI is the natural home for Java developers already in the Spring ecosystem. Its zero-configuration auto-wiring, native Actuator/Micrometer/OTel integration, and backing by the Spring team make it the lower-friction choice for teams who want to add AI capabilities to existing Spring Boot services without introducing new paradigms.

LangChain4j is the more flexible, framework-agnostic option with broader LLM provider coverage and a richer RAG pipeline model. The AiServices interface pattern is elegant and scales well as AI complexity grows. If you need Cohere, Hugging Face, advanced RAG control, or you are not on Spring, LangChain4j is the answer.

For teams starting fresh in 2026: default to Spring AI if you are Spring-native, and consider LangChain4j when you hit the edge of what Spring AI offers. Both are Apache-licensed, actively maintained, and worthy of production trust.

Next steps:
Stay Updated with Techoral

Get Java AI and Spring Boot guides weekly in your inbox.